Tuesday, 5 August 2025

Use of Rhetoric by the Ancient Greek Playwrights

Aeschylus (c. 525/524 – c. 456/455 BC)


Aeschylus's style is grand, majestic, and often archaic. His rhetoric is less about sophistic debate and more about creating powerful emotional states, religious awe, and immense pathos through elevated language.


Play: Agamemnon


Location: Lines 931-949 (Clytemnestra persuading Agamemnon to walk on the purple tapestries).


Rhetorical Tool: Persuasion (combined with Sophistry).


Analysis: Clytemnestra's argument is a masterpiece of manipulation. She equates his refusal to a potential vow made in fear, subtly challenges his manhood ("Or is it the voice of envy you fear?"), and reframes his trampling of the precious fabrics not as hubris, but as an act befitting a victor. For the audience, this is a moment of extreme tension. They know trampling on such wealth is a direct challenge to the gods. Agamemnon's capitulation is not just a domestic defeat but a sign of his fatal pride (ὕβρις), sealing his doom. Her rhetorical victory is his moral and literal death sentence.


Play: Agamemnon


Location: Lines 1404-1406 (Clytemnestra standing over the bodies).


Rhetorical Tool: Apostrophe (addressing an absent or inanimate object).


Analysis: After killing her husband, Clytemnestra describes the blood spatter: "He sprayed me with the crimson drops, a dark-red dew, and I rejoiced, as the sown earth rejoices in the glory of the rain that Zeus sends for the birth of the swelling buds." She addresses the blood as "dew" and compares her joy to that of the earth. This shocking and perverse apostrophe and simile reveal the depths of her passion and her complete inversion of natural order (blood as life-giving rain). It horrifies the audience by showing her actions not as a moment of madness, but as a fulfilling, almost orgasmic, consummation of her hatred.


Play: The Libation Bearers


Location: Lines 315-478 (The Great Kommos).


Rhetorical Tool: Anaphora (repetition of a word or phrase at the beginning of successive clauses).


Analysis: Throughout this long, lyric exchange between Orestes, Electra, and the Chorus, they repeatedly call upon the dead Agamemnon and the gods below. The structure often involves repeating phrases of lament or calls for vengeance. This anaphora gives the scene a ritualistic, incantatory power. It's not a logical argument but a rhetorical summoning of chthonic power, winding the characters (and the audience) up to the fever pitch required for Orestes to commit matricide.


Play: The Eumenides


Location: Lines 574-753 (The trial of Orestes).


Rhetorical Tool: Agon (formal contest or debate).


Analysis: The entire trial is a formal rhetorical debate between Apollo (for the defence) and the Chorus of Furies (for the prosecution), with Athena as judge. Apollo uses arguments from logos (the father is the true parent, not the mother) while the Furies argue from ancient tradition and pathos (the horror of matricide). This is the structural culmination of the entire trilogy, externalising the play's central conflicts: old vs. new gods, male vs. female, darkness vs. light, vengeance vs. civic justice. The use of the agon form makes a philosophical debate into a thrilling dramatic event.


Play: Prometheus Bound


Location: Lines 88-127 (Prometheus's first monologue).


Rhetorical Tool: Apostrophe.


Analysis: Chained to the rock and finally alone, Prometheus does not speak to anyone, but to the elements themselves: "O divine air, and sky, and swift-winged winds! O river springs, and laughter of the countless waves of the sea! O mother earth, all-generating! And you, all-seeing circle of the sun, I call on you!" This address to the cosmos immediately establishes the cosmic scale of his suffering. It generates immense pathos and grandeur, showing him as a divine being whose agony is felt by the very fabric of the world.


Play: Agamemnon


Location: Lines 1119-1129 (Cassandra's vision).


Rhetorical Tool: Epizeuxis (repetition of a word for emphasis).


Analysis: In the grip of her prophetic madness, Cassandra cries out, "Apollo, Apollo! God of the ways, my destroyer!" The frantic repetition of the god's name communicates her terror and helplessness far more effectively than a simple statement. It mimics a breathless, panicked cry, drawing the audience into her state of divine torment.


Sophocles (c. 497/496 – c. 406/405 BC)


Sophocles is the master of dramatic structure and psychological depth. His most potent rhetorical tool is irony, where the words spoken have a second layer of meaning, known to the audience but not to the character.


Play: Oedipus Rex


Location: Lines 216-275 (Oedipus's proclamation to the people of Thebes).


Rhetorical Tool: Dramatic Irony.


Analysis: This entire speech is drenched in irony. Oedipus, seeking the murderer of Laius, declares: "I forbid that man, whoever he may be, my land... and I pray that the murderer's life be consumed in evil and wretchedness. And as for me, this curse applies no less if he is found to be a sharer of my hearth." The audience knows he is the murderer he seeks. Every word he speaks is an unwitting curse upon himself. This creates an almost unbearable tension and a profound sense of tragic destiny. The rhetoric of a king exercising justice becomes the instrument of his own self-destruction.


Play: Antigone


Location: Lines 499-525 (The confrontation between Antigone and Creon).


Rhetorical Tool: Stichomythia (rapid, line-for-line dialogue).


Analysis:


Creon: And you still dared to transgress these laws? Antigone: Because it was not Zeus who proclaimed them. ... Creon: An enemy is never a friend, not even in death. Antigone: I was born to join in love, not hate. This quick, alternating exchange sharpens the conflict to a razor's edge. It shows the complete incompatibility of their worldviews, leaving no room for compromise. The rhetorical form mirrors the thematic content: two unmovable forces clashing directly.


Play: Antigone


Location: Lines 450-470 (Antigone's speech on divine law).


Rhetorical Tool: Antithesis (contrast of ideas).


Analysis: Antigone's entire defence is built on a series of antitheses: the contrast between Creon's mortal decree and the "unwritten and unfailing statutes of the gods"; between "today and yesterday" and "all time"; between human law and divine law. This starkly frames the central conflict of the play and elevates her defiance from mere stubbornness to a principled, theological stand.


Play: Oedipus Rex


Location: Lines 350-403 (The argument between Oedipus and Tiresias).


Rhetorical Tool: Invective (abusive language) and Rhetorical Question.


Analysis: As Oedipus's frustration grows, he lashes out at Tiresias, calling him a "wicked old man" and accusing him of conspiracy. Tiresias retorts with devastating accusations disguised as questions: "Who is the slayer, but you? Who is the unholy polluter of this land?" The shift from reasoned inquiry to vicious invective shows Oedipus’s fatal flaw—his anger and pride. It demonstrates how, when his logos fails, he resorts to force, a key aspect of his tragic character.


Play: Philoctetes


Location: Lines 927-950 (Philoctetes's reaction to the deception).


Rhetorical Tool: Pathos (appeal to emotion).


Analysis: On discovering Odysseus's and Neoptolemus's trick to steal his bow, Philoctetes delivers a speech of pure emotional agony. He addresses the landscape of his lonely island, lamenting his betrayal. "O caves and headlands, O dens of wild creatures... I cry to you... see what the son of Achilles has done to me!" This powerful appeal to pity highlights the cruelty of the "heroic" Odysseus and forces the audience (and Neoptolemus) to question whether the ends justify such brutal means.


Play: Ajax


Location: Lines 815-865 (Ajax's final monologue).


Rhetorical Tool: Personification.


Analysis: Before falling on his sword, Ajax speaks to the sword itself, a gift from his enemy Hector, asking it to give him a swift death. He then addresses Death, asking it to come for him, and the Sun, asking it to tell his father of his fate. By personifying these concepts, Sophocles elevates Ajax's suicide from a simple act of despair into a cosmic event, a final ordering of his relationship with his own glory, his enemies, and the gods.


Euripides (c. 480 – c. 406 BC)


Euripides, the most "modern" of the tragedians, was deeply influenced by the philosophical and rhetorical movements of his day. His plays are filled with sophisticated arguments, psychological realism, and powerful emotional appeals.


Play: Medea


Location: Lines 214-266 (Medea's first speech to the Chorus of Corinthian women).


Rhetorical Tool: Ethos (establishing credibility) and Pathos.


Analysis: This is a masterful piece of rhetoric. Medea emerges, calm and reasonable. She builds a common bond (ethos) with the Chorus by speaking of the wretched lot of women in general: their powerlessness, the dangers of childbirth, their reliance on men. "Of all creatures that have life and reason, we women are the most miserable." By framing her personal plight as a universal female experience, she secures the Chorus's sympathy and their oath of silence. This rhetorical victory is the crucial first step in her revenge plot.


Play: Medea


Location: Lines 465-575 (The agon between Medea and Jason).


Rhetorical Tool: Agon featuring Sophistry.


Analysis: Jason presents a seemingly logical (logos) argument that his new marriage will benefit Medea and their children. He uses sophistic reasoning, twisting the truth to paint himself as a rational benefactor. Medea counters with pure, passionate pathos, reminding him of the oaths he swore and the sacrifices she made for him. The clash reveals Jason's character as a cold, self-serving opportunist and Medea's as one who operates on a more primal level of justice and loyalty.


Play: The Trojan Women


Location: Lines 95-152 (Hecuba's opening lament).


Rhetorical Tool: Apostrophe and Pathos.


Analysis: Hecuba, lying on the ground, addresses the ruins of her city and the ghosts of her family. "Lift up your head from the dust, lift up your neck." She is speaking to herself, but also to the fallen Troy. This speech sets the tone for the entire play, which is less a plot-driven drama and more a sustained lyrical exploration of suffering. Euripides uses Hecuba's raw grief to launch a powerful anti-war statement, forcing the Athenian audience to confront the human cost of their own military ventures.


Play: The Bacchae


Location: Lines 434-518 (The first encounter between Dionysus and Pentheus).


Rhetorical Tool: Stichomythia and Irony.


Analysis: The line-by-line exchange between the disguised god and the mortal king is filled with double meanings. Pentheus asks questions, seeking to assert his authority, but Dionysus's answers are enigmatic and subtly mock him. For example, when Pentheus asks what the god's rites are like, Dionysus says, "It is not lawful for the uninitiated to know." The irony is that Pentheus's refusal to be initiated is precisely what will destroy him. This rhetorical dance shows the futility of mortal reason and force against the divine.


Play: Medea


Location: Lines 1021-1080 (Medea's monologue debating killing her children).


Rhetorical Tool: Internal Debate / Antithesis.


Analysis: This is one of the most psychologically powerful moments in all of Greek tragedy. Medea argues with herself, pitting her maternal love against her desire for vengeance. "Oh, what am I to do? My heart fails me, women, when I see their bright young faces... I cannot do it." Then, her resolve hardens: "Must I be a laughing-stock by letting my enemies go unpunished?" This internal antithesis gives the audience a raw, unprecedented view into a character's soul at a moment of extreme crisis, making her final decision all the more horrific and tragic.


Play: Hippolytus


Location: Lines 902-980 (The agon between Theseus and Hippolytus).


Rhetorical Tool: Argument from Probability (eikos).


Analysis: Theseus, holding the note from his dead wife Phaedra accusing Hippolytus of rape, refuses to listen to his son. His argument is based on probability: why would she kill herself and lie? Hippolytus, bound by an oath of secrecy to the Nurse, cannot reveal the whole truth. He is forced to argue his own virtuous character (ethos), but it is useless against the "proof" of the letter. Euripides here dramatises a tragic legal situation where circumstantial evidence (the letter) and a probable argument destroy an innocent man who cannot produce counter-evidence.


Play: Hecuba


Location: Lines 1187-1237 (Hecuba's argument against Polymestor).


Rhetorical Tool: Forensic Rhetoric.


Analysis: After she has blinded Polymestor, Hecuba engages in a formal debate with him before Agamemnon. She employs the techniques of a courtroom orator, systematically dismantling his excuses for murdering her son Polydorus. She uses logos to show that his motive was greed, not politics. This scene shows how grief has turned Hecuba into a terrifyingly effective legal mind, using the tools of civilisation to justify her brutal, primal revenge.


Aristophanes (c. 446 – c. 386 BC)


Aristophanes uses the same rhetorical tools as the tragedians, but for comic effect. He parodies political speech, sophistry, and literary styles to satirise Athenian life.


Play: The Frogs


Location: Lines 1378-1410 (The weighing of the verses).


Rhetorical Tool: Parody and Literalised Metaphor.


Analysis: In the contest between Aeschylus and Euripides, Dionysus decides to weigh their lines of poetry on a giant scale. Aeschylus's grand, heavy verses ("River Spercheios, and cattle-grazing pastures") always outweigh Euripides's lighter, more cerebral lines ("Persuasion has no temple other than speech"). This is a brilliant parody of literary criticism. The metaphorical "weight" of a line is made literal, creating a fantastic visual gag that hilariously summarises the stylistic differences between the two poets.


Play: The Clouds


Location: Lines 889-1104 (The debate between the Better Argument and the Worse Argument).


Rhetorical Tool: Agon and Parody of Sophistry.


Analysis: Two personified arguments debate for the soul of a young student. The Better Argument represents old-fashioned, disciplined education, while the Worse Argument represents amoral, sophistic rhetoric that can "make the weaker argument appear the stronger." The Worse Argument wins by twisting logic, appealing to base desires, and using clever but meaningless rhetoric. This is a direct satirical attack on the new philosophical education in Athens, which Aristophanes believed was corrupting the youth.


Play: Lysistrata


Location: Lines 1114-1188 (Lysistrata’s speech to the Athenian and Spartan delegates).


Rhetorical Tool: Panhellenic Persuasion.


Analysis: Having brought the men of Greece to their knees, Lysistrata delivers a powerful speech. She doesn't just scold them; she reminds them of their shared heritage, their common religion at places like Olympia and Delphi, and their common external enemies (the Persians). This is a classic rhetorical strategy of creating a shared identity (ethos) to overcome internal division. It is both funny, because of the context (the men are all suffering from painful erections), and genuinely moving in its appeal for peace.


Play: The Birds


Location: Lines 460-626 (Peisthetaerus's great speech to the birds).


Rhetorical Tool: Hyperbole (exaggeration).


Analysis: The smooth-talking Athenian, Peisthetaerus, convinces the birds to create their own kingdom in the sky. He does this through wild hyperbole, arguing that the birds were originally kings of everything, older than the gods themselves, and that by building Cloud-Cuckoo-Land they can starve the gods into submission. It is a perfect parody of the speeches of a demagogue, using grand promises and a twisted version of history to whip a crowd into a frenzy and seize power.


Play: The Acharnians


Location: Lines 496-556 (Dicaeopolis's speech parodying Euripides).


Rhetorical Tool: Parody and Pathos.


Analysis: To plead his case for making a private peace with Sparta, the farmer Dicaeopolis borrows tragic rags from Euripides to make himself look more pathetic. His speech is a masterful parody of Euripidean pathos, mixing high-flown tragic language with mundane complaints about market inspectors and garlic. This self-conscious use of another playwright's style shows the audience's deep familiarity with rhetorical modes and creates a complex layer of comedy.


Play: Lysistrata


Location: Lines 551-586 (Lysistrata's wool-working metaphor).


Rhetorical Tool: Extended Metaphor (or Allegory).


Analysis: When a magistrate asks how women can possibly solve the problems of the state, Lysistrata explains it using an extended metaphor of weaving. The city is like a tangled fleece of wool that must be washed, beaten to remove the burrs (bad citizens), carded to bring everyone together, and then spun into a strong yarn of unity. This brilliant metaphor takes a familiar domestic task and turns it into a clear, logical, and persuasive model for civic reform, rhetorically demonstrating that female skills are indeed applicable to running the state.


Play: The Frogs


Location: Lines 905-970 (Euripides's critique of Aeschylus).


Rhetorical Tool: Satirical Logos.


Analysis: Euripides attacks Aeschylus for his long silences, obscure language, and repetitive prologues. He applies a form of "logical" criticism, breaking down Aeschylus's lines to show their alleged absurdity. The famous running gag, "lekythion apolesen" ("he lost his little oil flask"), which he shows can be nonsensically added to the end of many of Aeschylus's prologue lines, is a perfect example. It's a parody of pedantic, deconstructive analysis, using logic for purely comic and destructive ends.


pray continue for more examples. 


Show thinking


Certainly. Here are further examples of the rich and varied use of rhetoric in Greek drama, continuing with the same structure and level of detail.


Aeschylus


Aeschylus continues to use rhetoric to build a world of divine consequence and human suffering, where language itself has a performative and prophetic power.


Play: Agamemnon


Location: Lines 1-39 (The Watchman's opening speech).


Rhetorical Tool: Aposiopesis (suddenly breaking off in speech).


Analysis: The Watchman speaks of the "house's secret" and the suffering within. Just as he is about to say more, he stops himself: "The rest is silence. A great ox stands upon my tongue." This deliberate silence is more powerful than any revelation. It creates an immediate sense of foreboding and conspiracy. For the audience, it signals that there are terrible truths hidden within the palace walls, establishing the play's oppressive atmosphere of dread and suppressed knowledge from the very first minute.


Play: Agamemnon


Location: Lines 104-159 (The Chorus's Parodos, describing the omen of the eagles).


Rhetorical Tool: Extended Simile / Allegory.


Analysis: The Chorus recounts the omen seen at Aulis: two eagles (Agamemnon and Menelaus) tearing a pregnant hare to pieces. The prophet Calchas interprets this as a sign of their future victory over Troy, but also warns that the goddess Artemis is angered by the killing of the helpless young. This is not just a simile; it's a complex allegory for the entire Trojan War. It predicts the brutal sack of the city but also foreshadows the divine anger that will lead to Agamemnon's demand to sacrifice his own daughter, Iphigenia, setting the entire tragic cycle in motion.


Play: The Eumenides


Location: Lines 321-396 (The Furies' "binding song").


Rhetorical Tool: Performative Utterance / Incantation.


Analysis: This is not an argument but a magical act performed through language. The Furies dance and chant a hymn that they claim will "wither" Orestes, bind his mind, and destroy him. The repetitive, hypnotic rhythm and the horrifying imagery ("a hymn from hell, to bind the soul") function as a curse. For the audience, this is a demonstration of old, chthonic, magical law made manifest. The rhetoric is the punishment, showcasing a form of justice that operates outside of reason and logic.


Sophocles


Sophocles continues to employ rhetoric to explore the tragic gap between appearance and reality, and the collision of individual will with unbending principles.


Play: Antigone


Location: Lines 162-210 (Creon's first speech as king).


Rhetorical Tool: Political Ethos and Metaphor.


Analysis: Creon’s inaugural address is a classic piece of political rhetoric designed to establish his authority (ethos). He uses the famous "ship of state" metaphor, declaring that the city has weathered a storm and he is now the firm captain at the helm. He lays out his principles: loyalty to the state above personal loyalty. This speech is crucial because it establishes his political philosophy before it is challenged. The audience hears a man who sounds reasonable and patriotic, which makes his later tyrannical inflexibility all the more tragic and pronounced.


Play: Antigone


Location: Lines 683-723 (Haemon's speech to Creon).


Rhetorical Tool: Diplomatic Logos / Analogy.


Analysis: Haemon's attempt to persuade his father is a model of careful, diplomatic rhetoric. Knowing Creon's temper, he doesn't challenge him directly. Instead, he uses analogies from nature: a tree that doesn't bend in a flood will be torn out by the roots; a sailor who keeps his sail too tight will capsize his boat. He is appealing to Creon's reason (logos) by offering practical wisdom rather than emotional defiance. The failure of this perfectly constructed, logical appeal demonstrates the sheer rigidity of Creon's mindset.


Play: Electra


Location: Lines 1126-1170 (Electra's lament over the urn).


Rhetorical Tool: Pathos combined with Dramatic Irony.


Analysis: The Paedagogus gives Electra an urn he claims holds the ashes of Orestes. Her subsequent lament is a speech of absolute and devastating grief, addressing the urn as if it were her brother. "O monument of him whom I loved best on earth... you are nothing... when I sent you from home, you were shining." The speech is heart-wrenching in its pathos. Its power is magnified tenfold for the audience by the dramatic irony of knowing that the real Orestes is standing right beside her, listening to her grief. The rhetoric of lament becomes a catalyst for the imminent recognition scene.


Play: Oedipus at Colonus


Location: Lines 589-603 (Theseus’s speech on mortality).


Rhetorical Tool: Gnome (a short, pithy statement of general truth) and Antithesis.


Analysis: In response to Creon's potential treachery, the hero-king Theseus delivers a philosophical reflection on change and decay. "Only to the gods comes no old age or death; all other things are confounded by all-powerful time. The earth's strength decays, the body's strength decays..." He contrasts the eternal gods with the decaying mortal world. This use of gnomic wisdom establishes his character as thoughtful and pious, providing a moral anchor in the play and a stark contrast to the volatile Creon and the cursed Oedipus.


Euripides


Euripides continues to push the boundaries, using rhetoric to stage philosophical debates and expose the raw, often ugly, psychology of his characters.


Play: Medea


Location: Lines 1136-1203 (The Messenger's speech describing the deaths of Glauce and Creon).


Rhetorical Tool: Enargeia (vivid, graphic description).


Analysis: Greek tragedy avoided showing violence onstage, so the messenger speech was used to paint a picture with words. This speech is perhaps the most famous example of enargeia. The messenger describes the princess's flesh melting from her bones "like pitch-pine tears" and her father dying in a grotesque embrace with her poisoned corpse. The language is so visceral and horrifying that it forces the audience to "see" the event in their minds, making Medea's revenge far more terrifying than any stage effect could achieve.


Play: Iphigenia at Aulis


Location: Lines 1211-1252 (Iphigenia's plea to Agamemnon).


Rhetorical Tool: Supplication (formal, ritualized pleading).


Analysis: Clinging to her father's knees in a formal act of supplication, Iphigenia makes her plea for life. She uses pure pathos, reminding him she was the first to call him "father" and sit on his lap. "Don't destroy me before my time... To see the light is sweetest for mortals; what is below is nothing." This is not a logical debate but a raw emotional appeal, using the rhetorical conventions of a suppliant to maximise the scene's tragic power. It puts Agamemnon's choice in the starkest possible terms: his ambition versus his daughter's life.


Play: Andromache


Location: Lines 147-273 (The agon between Andromache and Hermione).


Rhetorical Tool: Invective and Ad Hominem (attacking the person, not the argument).


Analysis: This vicious debate is less about logic and more about personal and nationalistic slurs. The Spartan Hermione attacks Andromache for being a "barbarian" from Troy, while Andromache attacks Spartan women for being promiscuous and undisciplined. "A Spartan girl could not be chaste even if she wanted to be." This use of invective reveals the deep-seated hatred and jealousy between the two women. It explores themes of racism, sexism, and the clash of cultures through raw, insulting rhetoric.


Play: The Bacchae


Location: Lines 266-327 (The speech of Tiresias).


Rhetorical Tool: Rationalizing Theology / Euhemerism.


Analysis: In trying to persuade Pentheus, the prophet Tiresias offers a surprisingly "modern" and rationalistic explanation of the new god. He suggests the story of Dionysus being sewn into Zeus's thigh is just a misunderstanding of words. He argues for accepting the god on pragmatic grounds. This is a fascinating use of sophistic rhetoric applied to theology, an attempt to make the irrational palatable to the rational mind. Its complete failure to sway Pentheus shows that the power of Dionysus cannot be contained, explained, or rationalized; it must be experienced.


Aristophanes


Aristophanes consistently deploys rhetoric for satirical demolition, holding up a comic mirror to the language of the courts, the assembly, and the theatre itself.


Play: The Wasps


Location: Lines 891-1008 (The trial of the dog).


Rhetorical Tool: Forensic Parody (parody of courtroom speeches).


Analysis: Philocleon (Lover-of-Cleon) stages a mock trial where one dog (representing the general Laches) is prosecuted by another dog (representing the demagogue Cleon) for stealing a "Sicilian cheese." The entire scene is a hilarious parody of Athenian legal procedure and rhetoric. The characters deliver passionate speeches, call witnesses (a mixing bowl), and appeal to the jury's emotions, all over a piece of cheese. This brilliantly satirises the Athenian obsession with litigation and how the grand language of justice was often used for petty, self-serving quarrels.


Play: The Knights


Location: The entire play, but especially lines 732-835.


Rhetorical Tool: Contest of Invective and Demagoguery.


Analysis: The play pits the demagogue Paphlagon (Cleon) against an upstart Sausage-Seller in a contest to see who can be the most shameless and effective panderer to Demos (the personification of the people). Their rhetoric consists of wild promises, fawning flattery, and vicious insults against each other. The Sausage-Seller wins not by being more virtuous, but by being even more vulgar and audacious than Paphlagon. Aristophanes uses this contest to argue that the Athenian people were being seduced by the worst kind of political rhetoric, showing how demagoguery corrupts both the speaker and the audience.


Play: Peace


Location: Lines 102-176 (Trygaeus addressing his dung beetle).


Rhetorical Tool: Parodic Apostrophe.


Analysis: As his hero, Trygaeus, prepares to fly to heaven on a giant dung beetle to find the goddess Peace, he addresses the beetle as if it were a noble steed or a winged horse like Pegasus. He calls it "my little Pegasus" and encourages it onward. This is a parody of the tragic hero's apostrophe to a grand object or animal. The comedy comes from the grotesque mismatch between the elevated, heroic language and the foul, lowly nature of the creature being addressed, satirising tragic grandeur itself.



Ancient Greek Plays and the Peloponnesian War

 

A Theatrical Reflection of Conflict and Society



I. Introduction


The Peloponnesian War (431-404 BCE) stands as a monumental and profoundly disruptive period in the annals of ancient Greek history. This protracted conflict, primarily fought between the Athenian-led Delian League and the Spartan-led Peloponnesian League, inflicted immense human cost, widespread economic devastation, and a deep crisis of identity upon Athens. The war ultimately stripped Athens of its preeminent position as the cultural and political capital among the Greek city-states.1

During this tumultuous era, ancient Greek theatre transcended its role as mere entertainment, evolving into an indispensable public forum. It served as a vital space for collective introspection, enabling citizens to grapple with profound societal anxieties and experiences.3 Playwrights, often deeply embedded in Athenian public life, utilized the stage as a powerful medium to reflect upon, comment on, and even influence public sentiment regarding the ongoing conflict. This report examines how the prominent playwrights of the Peloponnesian War era—Aristophanes in comedy, and Euripides and Sophocles in tragedy—engaged with this defining conflict. Their plays, through direct satire, subtle allusions, and profound allegorical narratives, offered diverse perspectives on the war's causes, its devastating consequences, and the complex moral dilemmas it presented to Athenian society.


II. The Comic Lens: Aristophanes and Direct Satire


Aristophanes, widely recognized as the most celebrated writer of Greek comedies, was a direct contemporary of the Peloponnesian War. Born in the 440s BCE, he experienced the entirety of the conflict, living through the significant upheaval that fundamentally altered Athens' status.1 His comedies are distinguished by their immediate and often biting commentary on contemporary events, political figures, and pressing societal issues, thereby functioning as unique historical documents that illuminate Athenian public discourse during the war.4


Aristophanes' Unique Position as a Contemporary Observer


Aristophanes' direct experience of the Peloponnesian War, which lasted from 431 to 404 BCE and led to Athens being stripped of its cultural and political leadership, imbued his plays with an immediate and compelling relevance for his contemporary audience.1 Of the 44 comedies he wrote, 11 have survived, with many directly addressing the protracted conflict.2 The genre he mastered, Old Comedy, was characterized by its "exuberant and high-spirited satire of public persons and affairs," frequently incorporating "outspoken political criticism".4 This form of theatre gained considerable popularity during the Peloponnesian War, providing Athenians with much-needed respite from the anxiety and hardships of the conflict.4

The enduring freedom of criticism and abuse permitted in Greek comedy, even amidst the strictures of wartime, allowed it to serve as a de facto public forum for unfiltered critique.6 In the absence of a modern "free press," the Athenian theatrical stage became a primary arena where political figures and policies could be directly challenged and ridiculed. This function offered an exaggerated, yet potent, reflection of popular sentiment and elite anxieties. The unique socio-political role of comedy in ancient Athens thus extended far beyond mere entertainment, becoming a vital medium for public debate and dissent.


Plays with Explicit War Commentary and Satire


Aristophanes' engagement with the Peloponnesian War was often explicit, employing direct satire to critique the conflict and its proponents.


The Acharnians (425 BCE)


This play was staged at the Lenaia festival, an event typically attended by fewer foreign dignitaries, which afforded Aristophanes greater latitude for direct and uninhibited expression of his views.5 The protagonist, Dikaiopolis, famously contrives a private peace treaty with the Spartans, a direct and imaginative response to the ongoing conflict.5 This fantastical premise enabled a stark comparison between the tangible benefits of peace and the severe hardships imposed by war.

The play also features a direct critique of war profiteers and populist politicians, exemplified by Dikaiopolis's complaint about Cleon "dragging me into court" over Aristophanes' earlier play, The Babylonians. The Babylonians had depicted cities of the Delian League as slaves, causing considerable embarrassment for Athenian authorities and leading to potential legal action by Cleon.5 This demonstrates Aristophanes' willingness to directly challenge powerful figures. A central theme is the Megarian embargo, which served as a pretext for the Peloponnesian War. Aristophanes comically attributes the war's origin to "three cunts," a pun on ancient slang, highlighting what he perceived as the absurdity and triviality of the conflict's perceived causes.5 This use of satire functions as a mechanism for public accountability and war critique. By reducing the war's justification to a crude pun, Aristophanes not only elicited laughter but also debased the conflict, stripping it of any perceived grandeur or necessity, thereby fostering anti-war sentiment among the audience.


The Knights (424 BCE)


The Knights is a notable example of Aristophanes' "merciless caricature of Cleon," a prominent populist politician of the era.5 Aristophanes himself directed this play, an uncommon occurrence, which underscores its personal significance and the intensity of his critique.5 The play allegorically depicts Cleon's corrupt service to the Athenian people by portraying him as a slave duping his master, Demos (representing the Athenian populace). The metaphor then shifts, presenting Cleon and his rival as competing

erastai (lovers), orators, and hawkers of oracles, all vying for public attention and approval.5

Despite the "strong anti-Cleon jokes" and the direct nature of the play's attack on his character, historical accounts indicate that these satirical diatribes had no immediate effect on Cleon's political career. He was elected to the prestigious board of ten generals just weeks after the play's performance.5 This outcome highlights a significant limitation of satire in affecting immediate political outcomes. While theatrical critique could certainly voice dissent and shape public opinion, it did not always translate into the immediate political defeat of its targets. This suggests a complex interplay between public sentiment, entrenched political power, and the resilience of demagoguery, even when subjected to intense public scrutiny.


Peace (421 BCE)


Peace was presented in 421 BCE, a period coinciding with the peace negotiations that eventually culminated in the Peace of Nicias, reflecting the widespread public hope for an end to the conflict.7 The play's narrative follows Trygaeus, a "weary Athenian citizen," who embarks on a fantastical journey to Olympus atop a giant dung beetle to complain to Zeus and plead for peace.7 He discovers that the gods have retreated, leaving the god of War to imprison Peace and prepare to destroy the Greek cities.7 Trygaeus, with the assistance of various Greek city-states, successfully rescues Peace, leading to widespread celebrations and a "hymn to peace".7

The play overtly ridicules war-mongers and arms dealers, depicting their inability to partake in the festivities and Trygaeus's mockery of their unfortunate situation.7 This comedic portrayal of their plight reinforces the moral imperative of peace. The timing of

Peace directly aligns with a moment of intense public yearning for an end to the Peloponnesian War. The fantastical journey to rescue Peace from the clutches of War serves as a powerful metaphor for the collective effort required to achieve harmony. The play's celebratory conclusion, juxtaposed with the lamentable fate of war profiteers, not only satirizes those who benefit from conflict but also reinforces the strong societal desire for peace. This demonstrates comedy's capacity to both reflect and actively shape public opinion, channeling collective anxieties and hopes into a shared theatrical experience.


Plays with Allegorical or Indirect Political Commentary


Beyond direct satire, Aristophanes also employed allegory and indirect commentary to address the war's broader implications and societal shifts.


Lysistrata (411 BCE)


Lysistrata was performed in 411 BCE, a period marked by "prolonged conflict" and an "oligarchic revolution" in Athens, following the catastrophic Athenian defeat in the Sicilian Expedition.5 The central plot revolves around women from warring Greek city-states, led by the Athenian Lysistrata, who initiate a sex strike to compel their men to negotiate peace.2 This act serves as a direct allegory for withholding essential resources or power necessary to sustain the war.11

Further, the old women of Athens seize the Acropolis, which housed the state treasury, thereby effectively cutting off war funding. This action directly symbolizes the economic and logistical disruption required to halt the conflict.11 The comedic conflict between the Chorus of Old Men, representing the traditional war-mongering establishment, and the Chorus of Old Women, embodying the peace movement, allegorizes the broader societal struggle over the war. The women's act of dousing the men's fire with water symbolizes the cooling of aggressive, war-like passions through unconventional methods.11 The play culminates in peace talks where "Reconciliation" is personified as a beautiful woman, whose allure distracts the male delegates from their squabbling, symbolizing peace's inherent power to overcome entrenched hostilities.11 Lysistrata's act of dressing the magistrate in women's attire and as a corpse further symbolizes the women taking over traditionally male roles and the symbolic "death" of the old, war-driven male order.11

Lysistrata transcends simple anti-war sentiment by proposing a radical, unconventional solution rooted in the subversion of traditional gender roles.10 The women's sex strike and seizure of the Acropolis are not merely comedic devices; they are powerful allegories for female agency and the notion that marginalized groups can exert significant political influence when traditional male-dominated approaches fail. This play implicitly critiques the patriarchal society that perpetuated the war, suggesting that a fundamental shift in societal power dynamics is necessary for true peace, thereby offering a profound commentary on the intersection of gender, power, and conflict.


The Birds (414 BCE)


The Birds was produced in 414 BCE, shortly after the commencement of the disastrous Sicilian Expedition, a major turning point in the Peloponnesian War.5 While the play contains "no direct mention of the Peloponnesian War" and "few references to Athenian politics," it is replete with "many indirect references to Athenian political and social life".13 The protagonists, Pisthetaerus and Euelpides, leave Athens, expressing disgust with its bureaucracy and seeking a new homeland free from burdensome rules.12 They proceed to establish "Cloud-cuckoo-land" (Nephelokokkygia) in the sky.8

Critics interpret the play as a "political satire on the imperialistic dreams" that fueled the ill-fated Sicilian Expedition.8 Pisthetaerus's transformation into an autocratic ruler and the birds' subsequent imperialistic drive to control the air mirrors Athens' "ever-unsatisfied" imperialistic ambitions.12 The seemingly fantastical and escapist nature of

The Birds conceals a deep political subtext.8 Its production immediately following the launch of the Sicilian Expedition suggests that the play functions as an allegorical commentary on Athens' imperial overreach and the growing disillusionment among its citizens with the ongoing war. The protagonists' desire to escape Athens reflects a widespread societal weariness, while the subsequent mirroring of Athenian imperial tendencies within their utopian bird kingdom implies that the destructive impulses of war and power are inherent, even in attempts to escape them. This demonstrates how comedy could utilize fantasy to critique fundamental aspects of Athenian wartime policy and national character without direct confrontation.


Thesmophoriazusae (c. 411 BCE)


Thesmophoriazusae is one of two comedies by Aristophanes from 411 BCE, produced alongside Lysistrata, a year marked by the ongoing Peloponnesian War and a brief oligarchic government in Athens.5 While often considered "least politically engaged" among his extant comedies, "some political tension is noticeable throughout".15 The play contains "well-chosen political references to war and failure" and provides "commentary on contemporary politics around the Sicilian expedition".16 It notably parodies lamentation scenes from tragedy, which, in this comic context, acquires "sociopolitical force".16 The subtle political allusions in

Thesmophoriazusae, despite its primary focus on Euripides and female rituals, underscore the pervasive influence of the Peloponnesian War on Athenian consciousness.15 Aristophanes' use of parody, particularly of tragic lament, allowed him to embed critiques of "war and failure" and the Sicilian Expedition within a seemingly apolitical comedic framework. This demonstrates a sophisticated form of intertextual commentary, where the audience's familiarity with tragic conventions was leveraged to evoke deeper sociopolitical meaning, suggesting that the war's impact was so profound it permeated even less overtly political dramatic works.


The Frogs (405 BCE)


The Frogs was produced in 405 BCE, during the "final years of the 5th century BC," reflecting the significant "transformations wrought by the Peloponnesian War" and the rise of oligarchy in Athens.3 The play functions as a "detailed political commentary" on the war's aftermath and the subsequent oligarchic coups.3 Its plot involves the god Dionysus traveling to Hades to bring back a great tragic poet to save Athens, leading to a contest between Aeschylus and Euripides.3 This debate is presented as a "political dispute" between traditional aristocratic values, represented by Aeschylus, and modern, new political ideas, embodied by Euripides.3

Through the play, Aristophanes "denounce[s] the end of Athenian prestige and hegemony" and critiques contemporary political leaders, including Alcibiades.3 Dionysus ultimately chooses Aeschylus, who is then appointed as an advisor responsible for charging "politicians considered enemies of peace with Sparta".3

The Frogs uniquely employs a literary competition in the underworld as a profound allegory for Athens' political and moral crisis at the war's conclusion. The choice between Aeschylus and Euripides is not merely aesthetic; it represents a fundamental debate about the kind of leadership and values necessary to restore Athens. Aristophanes' clear preference for Aeschylus and his traditional, aristocratic virtues signifies a yearning for a return to perceived past glories and stable leadership, implicitly condemning the "new politicians" and "demagogues" whom he believed led Athens astray. This demonstrates how comedy could directly engage with fundamental questions of governance, national character, and the very soul of the polis during a period of profound defeat and uncertainty.


Table 1: Aristophanes' Plays and Peloponnesian War Connections



Play Title

Date (BCE)

Type of Connection

Key Themes/Allegories

The Acharnians

425

Direct Satire

Private peace treaty with Spartans; critique of war profiteers (Cleon); absurd origins of war (Megarian embargo) 5

The Knights

424

Direct Satire

Merciless caricature of Cleon; allegorical depiction of corrupt leadership 5

Peace

421

Direct Satire

Quest for peace during negotiations; ridicule of war-mongers; collective desire for harmony 7

Lysistrata

411

Allegorical Critique

Women's sex strike for peace; seizure of state treasury (Acropolis); subversion of gender roles; personification of Reconciliation 10

The Birds

414

Indirect Commentary/Allegory

Escapism from Athenian bureaucracy; satire of imperialistic dreams (Sicilian Expedition); mirroring of Athenian imperial ambition in utopian state 8

Thesmophoriazusae

c. 411

Indirect Political Allusion

Political tension amidst war and oligarchy; commentary on Sicilian Expedition; parody of tragic lament with sociopolitical force 15

The Frogs

405

Political Commentary/Allegory

Crisis of Athenian leadership post-war; debate between traditional (Aeschylus) and modern (Euripides) values; critique of demagogues 3


III. The Tragic Mirror: Euripides and the Horrors of War


Euripides, the youngest of the three preeminent Greek tragedians, lived through the entirety of the Peloponnesian War, with the zenith of his literary genius coinciding precisely with this period.2 In contrast to Aeschylus, whose extant plays predate the Peloponnesian War and focus on earlier conflicts such as the Persian Wars, Euripides' works directly reflect the profound bloodshed and societal upheaval he witnessed.17 Aeschylus's plays, including

Persians (472 BCE) and Seven Against Thebes (467 BCE), primarily address historical events and myths that occurred prior to the Peloponnesian War's commencement in 431 BCE; consequently, they do not directly mention or serve as allegories for this specific conflict.2 Euripides' tragedies are characterized by a profound focus on human suffering, moral degradation, and the psychological impact of war, frequently appealing to a sense of pity and advocating for peace.17 He was renowned for unmasking heroic figures and amplifying the voices of the powerless, particularly women and children.21


Plays Reflecting Disillusionment and Suffering


Euripides’ tragedies often served as a powerful reflection of the disillusionment and suffering engendered by the Peloponnesian War.


The Trojan Women (415 BCE)


Produced in 415 BCE, The Trojan Women is widely regarded as a "powerfully disturbing play on the horrors of war".22 Its timing is critically significant, having been composed "in the aftermath of the Melian massacre and during the preparations for the Sicilian Expedition".22 The play is described as "purely allegorical" 24, symbolizing Athens' "brutal invasion of the small island of Melos," where the men were executed and women and children enslaved for their neutrality.24 Euripides masterfully utilized the ancient Trojan myth to "criticize the extreme use of military force" prevalent in his own time.24

The play delves into the "consequences of war for the structures of thought, the beliefs, values – the ideology – in which Athenians lived".25 It starkly highlights the "devastating effects on the innocent, particularly women and children," and explores enduring themes of "loss, grief, and the resilience of the human spirit".23 The explicit connection between

The Trojan Women and the Melian Massacre reveals tragedy's capacity to function as a direct moral indictment of contemporary Athenian policy.22 By allegorizing a recent atrocity through the ancient myth of Troy's destruction, Euripides compelled his audience to confront the horrific consequences of their own imperialistic actions. The play's focus on the suffering of women and children underscores the universal and often overlooked victims of war, challenging prevailing heroic narratives and exposing the "naked hollowness" of conquest.17 This demonstrates tragedy's power to provoke profound empathy and moral reckoning, even when presenting uncomfortable truths.


Hecuba


Set in the aftermath of the Trojan War, Hecuba portrays the profound grief and vengeful actions of its titular character against her Greek captors.21 The play contains specific allusions to the Peloponnesian War through its characterization of Odysseus, who is described as "agile-minded, sweet-talking, demos-pleasing" (lines 131–32).22 Scholars interpret this as a direct reference to the "war-time demagogues active in Athens during the Peloponnesian War".22 Euripides is particularly noted for his skill in using the mythical past as a vehicle for discussing contemporary issues "more controversially and pointedly than those in plays by Aeschylus and Sophocles".22 Euripides' subtle yet pointed characterization of Odysseus in

Hecuba exemplifies how tragedy could embed contemporary political critique within mythical narratives. Unlike comedy's overt caricatures, Euripides utilizes a well-known mythical figure to allude to the rise of populist leaders (demagogues) during the Peloponnesian War. These figures, through their persuasive rhetoric, may have contributed to Athens' "outsized ambitions".21 This approach suggests a more nuanced, and perhaps more insidious, form of critique, inviting the audience to draw unsettling parallels between the mythical past and their present political reality, thereby questioning the integrity of contemporary leadership.


Plays with Patriotic Themes and Warnings


Euripides also explored themes of patriotism, often intertwined with cautionary messages, as the war progressed.


Children of Heracles (c. 430 BCE)


This play was most likely written early in the Peloponnesian War, approximately between 430 and 429 BCE.22 The tragedy explores Athenian ideals of asylum and justice, as Athens, personified by King Demophon, offers refuge to Heracles' persecuted children who are fleeing King Eurystheus.23 This narrative highlights Athens' self-proclaimed role as a "protector of the oppressed and a beacon of civilization".23

However, the play is simultaneously interpreted as a "warning to a city at war".26 The conclusion, where Alcmene, Heracles' mother, insists on the vengeful execution of Eurystheus despite Athenian custom, is perceived as a cautionary tale about the "regrettable actions" and moral compromises Athens might be tempted to make during the Peloponnesian War.26

Children of Heracles thus presents a complex and evolving view of Athenian patriotism during the early stages of the Peloponnesian War. While initially celebrating Athens' noble ideals of asylum and justice 23, the play subtly introduces a darker undercurrent. Alcmene's vengeful demand at the play's conclusion, despite Athenian custom, serves as a prophetic warning to Athens itself. This suggests that Euripides used the mythical narrative to explore the potential for wartime pressures to corrupt even the most cherished civic virtues, highlighting the dangers of unchecked vengeance and the erosion of moral principles in the pursuit of victory.


The Suppliants (423 BCE)


The Suppliants is a tragedy that explores themes of duty, honor, and the profound consequences of war, with a particular focus on the sacred right to burial for fallen soldiers.17 The play contains a clear topical allusion to a specific contemporary event in the Peloponnesian War: the Athenian army's defeat at Delium in 424 BCE, where the Thebans initially refused to allow the burial of Athenian dead. This act was considered a grave impiety in ancient Greek culture.29

King Theseus of Athens is portrayed as embodying an "idealized democracy that stands and fights for the freedom and the rights of the oppressed," as he intervenes to secure the burial of the Argive dead.28 The play is described as "clearly pro-Athenian" and "designed to praise the Athenians," while simultaneously being "clearly critical of war and pro-peace".29 By directly referencing the contemporary issue of denied burial rights after the Battle of Delium, Euripides elevates

The Suppliants from a mythological retelling to a poignant commentary on wartime ethics and the violation of fundamental "international law".29 The play's portrayal of Athens, through Theseus, as the champion of humane conduct and justice implicitly critiques the barbarity of their enemies while reinforcing Athenian civic values. This demonstrates how tragedy could engage with immediate political and moral controversies, using mythical narratives to advocate for humane treatment in warfare and uphold essential cultural norms even amidst conflict.


Table 2: Euripides' Plays and Peloponnesian War Connections


| Play Title | Date (BCE) | Type of Connection | Key Themes/Allegories |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Children of Heracles | c. 430 | Patriotic/Warning | Athenian ideals of asylum and justice; warning against wartime vengeance and erosion of ideals 23 |


| The Suppliants | 423 | Thematic Parallel/Topical Allusion | Duty, honor, consequences of war; right to burial (alludes to Battle of Delium); Athenian advocacy for wartime ethics 28 |


| Hecuba | N/A (mid-war) | Allusion/Thematic Parallel | Grief and vengeance post-war; characterization of Odysseus alludes to wartime demagogues 21 |


| The Trojan Women | 415 | Allegorical Critique | Horrors of war; direct allegory for Melian Massacre and Sicilian Expedition; suffering of women and children; critique of imperialism 22 |


IV. Sophocles: Enduring Themes in a Time of Conflict


Sophocles, an older contemporary of Euripides, was deeply involved in Athenian public life throughout the Peloponnesian War. He held significant political and military positions, serving as a strategos (general) alongside Pericles and later being elected as one of the probouloi (commissioners) in 411 BCE, a role in which he responded to the catastrophic Athenian defeat in the Sicilian Expedition.2 While his surviving tragedies are generally less overtly political or satirical than Aristophanes' comedies, they nonetheless resonate profoundly with the anxieties, moral questions, and societal shifts brought about by the prolonged conflict. Only seven of his more than 120 plays have survived to the present day.2


Plays with Contemporary Resonance


Sophocles' tragedies, though often rooted in ancient myths, frequently echoed the contemporary realities and concerns of the Peloponnesian War era.


Philoctetes (409 BCE)


This play was written and performed during the Peloponnesian War in 409 BCE, where it was awarded first prize at the City Dionysia.32 The plot centers on Odysseus's deceptive scheme to trick the abandoned hero Philoctetes into returning to the Trojan War with his powerful bow, which is prophesied as essential for Greek victory.33 The play explores profound themes highly relevant to wartime experiences: "friendship, trauma, deception versus morality, fate, and the individual versus the collective".33 Neoptolemus, who is tasked with carrying out the deception, grapples intensely with the ethical implications of his actions.33

Philoctetes, composed during a critical phase of the Peloponnesian War, delves into the ethical dilemmas inherent in prolonged conflict.32 The central tension between "deception, ethics, and war" and the struggle between "decisions, obligation, and the greater good" directly mirror the moral compromises Athens faced, particularly in the aftermath of the Sicilian disaster.34 Neoptolemus's internal conflict over using deceit for a perceived greater good can be interpreted as an allegorical representation of the ethical challenges confronting Athenian leaders and citizens, who were compelled to make difficult, often morally ambiguous, choices to secure victory in a brutal war. This highlights Sophocles' exploration of the human cost of wartime pragmatism.


Oedipus at Colonus (401 BCE, posthumous)


This play was performed posthumously in 401 BCE, following Sophocles' death in the winter of 406/5 BCE.31 Its setting is Sophocles' birthplace, Colonus.31 The central themes include Oedipus's profound suffering leading to a newfound spiritual authority, and the prophecy that his dead body will confer divine benefits upon the land where he is buried.35 King Theseus of Athens offers Oedipus protection, convinced that Athens will prosper in a future war against Thebes if Oedipus is buried in Athenian soil.35 This transformative act elevates a "small deme into a major stronghold of Athens".36

The posthumous performance of Oedipus at Colonus in 401 BCE, immediately following Athens' devastating defeat in the Peloponnesian War, is crucial for understanding its political significance.31 The play's core message—that Oedipus's sacred burial in Athenian soil will bring divine protection and future prosperity to Athens against its enemies—functions as a powerful act of civic and spiritual reassurance for a defeated city.35 It reasserts Athenian "greatness in the face of immense misfortune" 36 and symbolizes a re-founding of Athenian identity through its sacred connection to its land and its heroes. This suggests that Sophocles, even from beyond the grave, offered a message of hope and resilience, vital for a populace grappling with profound loss and an uncertain future.


Oedipus Rex (Oedipus the King) (c. 430-420 BCE)


While not directly about the Peloponnesian War, this tragedy, written in the first half of the 430-420 BCE decade, prominently features a "lethal plague" devastating Thebes.37 Scholars note that this fictional plague reflects the actual Plague of Athens (c. 430 BCE) described by Thucydides, which occurred around the time Sophocles wrote the play.37 Although the epidemic primarily serves as a background for the plot, it taps into contemporary anxieties about disease and societal breakdown during the war.37 The inclusion of a "devastating plague" in

Oedipus Rex, written concurrently with the real Plague of Athens, demonstrates how Sophocles integrated contemporary societal anxieties into his mythical narratives.37 The plague, a tangible and terrifying reality for Athenians during the Peloponnesian War, served as a powerful metaphor for societal decay, divine displeasure, and the breakdown of order. By featuring such a prominent backdrop, Sophocles ensured that his tragedy resonated deeply with a populace experiencing similar suffering, highlighting how even plays not explicitly about the war could reflect its profound psychological and social impact.


Table 3: Sophocles' Plays and Peloponnesian War Connections


| Play Title | Date (BCE) | Type of Connection | Key Themes/Allegories |

| :--- | :--- | :--- | :--- | | Oedipus Rex | c. 430-420 | Reflection of Shared Anxiety | Devastating plague as a metaphor for societal decay and contemporary anxieties (Plague of Athens) 37 |


| Philoctetes | 409 | Allegorical Resonance | Deception, ethics of war, individual vs. collective; moral compromises and wartime pragmatism 32 |


| Oedipus at Colonus | 401 (posthumous) | Post-War Reassurance/Civic Identity | Spiritual authority from suffering; sacred protection for Athens; reaffirmation of civic identity and resilience post-defeat 35 |


V. Conclusion


Ancient Greek drama, particularly the surviving works of Aristophanes, Euripides, and Sophocles, functioned as an indispensable platform for processing, critiquing, and reflecting on the Peloponnesian War. These playwrights, each possessing a distinct artistic voice, collectively provided a comprehensive theatrical mirror to the conflict, engaging with its profound political, social, and moral dimensions.

Comedy, as exemplified by Aristophanes, employed direct satire and overt political commentary, often ridiculing specific figures and policies in plays such as The Acharnians and The Knights. It offered immediate, often fantastical, solutions to wartime woes, as seen in Peace and Lysistrata, and utilized allegories to critique imperial ambitions and societal norms in Lysistrata and The Birds. Comedy thus provided a unique space for unfiltered dissent and reflected the popular yearning for peace and stability.

Tragedy, through the works of Euripides and Sophocles, explored the profound human suffering and moral compromises inherent in war through the lens of mythological narratives. Euripides, in particular, offered powerful allegorical critiques of Athenian imperialism and its brutal consequences in The Trojan Women and Hecuba, while also examining the erosion of civic ideals and wartime ethics in Children of Heracles and The Suppliants. Sophocles, though less overtly political, probed universal themes of moral dilemma, deception, and the individual's struggle in a time of conflict, as demonstrated in Philoctetes. Furthermore, in the war's aftermath, his Oedipus at Colonus offered messages of civic reassurance and the enduring sacredness of Athens, often integrating contemporary anxieties like the plague as thematic backdrops, as observed in Oedipus Rex.

The plays from this era remain invaluable historical documents, offering unique insights into contemporary perspectives on the Peloponnesian War. Beyond their historical significance, they stand as timeless explorations of war's multifaceted impact on individuals, society, and the very fabric of civilization, continuing to resonate with audiences grappling with conflict and its aftermath today.

Works cited

  1. www.randolphcollege.edu, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.randolphcollege.edu/greekplay/ancient-greek-playwrights/#:~:text=ARISTOPHANES,of%20the%20Greek%20city%2Dstates.

  2. Ancient Greek Playwrights - The Randolph College Greek Play, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.randolphcollege.edu/greekplay/ancient-greek-playwrights/

  3. The Athenian Theater as the Stage for Political Factions: A ... - SciELO, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.scielo.br/j/bak/a/cNwMRpJMFgmBQxgBrYtLtSw/?format=pdf&lang=en

  4. 206 Classical Greek Theatre, Classical Drama and Theatre - Utah State University, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.usu.edu/markdamen/clasdram/chapters/061gkthea.htm

  5. Aristophanes - Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aristophanes

  6. the life of greece crete 01, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://home.ubalt.edu/NTYGFIT/ai_01_pursuing_fame/ai_01_tell/wd_tlog2_15_aristophanes.htm

  7. Aristophanes' Peace, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.fhw.gr/choros/epidaurus/en/exhibit/model/peace.html

  8. Birds | Comedy, Ancient Greece, Satire - Britannica, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.britannica.com/topic/Birds

  9. Peace by Aristophanes | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/peace-aristophanes

  10. Lysistrata - (World Literature I) - Vocab, Definition, Explanations | Fiveable, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://library.fiveable.me/key-terms/world-literature-i/lysistrata

  11. Lysistrata - Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysistrata

  12. Democracy and Artistophanes' The Birds - ScholarWorks@GVSU, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1007&context=ssd_orals

  13. The Birds (play) - Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Birds_(play)

  14. About: The Birds (play) - DBpedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://dbpedia.org/page/The_Birds_(play)

  15. Comfort Classics: Matt Simonton - Classical Studies Support, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://classicalstudies.support/2020/07/22/comfort-classics-matt-simonton/

  16. GREEK COMEDY'S PARODY OF LAMENT - Oxford Academic, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://academic.oup.com/book/46913/chapter/422627677/chapter-pdf/52560728/isbn-9780195336924-book-part-9.pdf

  17. Euripides: Poet-Prophet of Pity - The Imaginative Conservative, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://theimaginativeconservative.org/2021/02/euripides-poet-prophet-pity-paul-krause.html

  18. The Extant Plays of Aeschylus - The Randolph College Greek Play, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.randolphcollege.edu/greekplay/the-extant-plays-of-aeschylus/

  19. Aeschylus - Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aeschylus

  20. Fear, Self-Pity, and War in Fifth-Century Athenian Tragedy: Ethos and Education in a Warrior Society - DOAJ, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://doaj.org/article/08844c90333242bc98900754a60bdd55

  21. Grief Lessons:Four Plays by Euripides | Seminary Co-op Bookstores, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.semcoop.com/grief-lessonsfour-plays-euripides

  22. Euripides - Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euripides

  23. Euripides: The Tragedian Who Revolutionized Ancient Greek Theatre - In2Greece, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.in2greece.com/english/historymyth/history/ancient/euripides.htm

  24. Trojan Women & Lysistrata: Women Hold the Power | by Carly Hughes | Medium, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://medium.com/@carly.hughes/trojan-women-lysistrata-women-hold-the-power-3c14ff8f9403

  25. chs.harvard.edu, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://chs.harvard.edu/chapter/5-a-river-shouting-with-tears/#:~:text=Thus%2C%20for%20him%2C%20the%20Trojan,event%20or%20set%20of%20events%2C

  26. Tragedy and Patriotism in Euripides's Heracleidae - Great Books Guy, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://greatbooksguy.com/2018/09/16/tragedy-and-patriotism-in-euripidess-heracleidae/

  27. The Children of Herakles by Euripides | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/children-herakles-euripides

  28. The Suppliants by Euripides | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/suppliants-euripides

  29. Euripides' Suppliants, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.uvm.edu/~jbailly/courses/clas21/notes/suppliants.html

  30. Suppliant Women - Brill, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://brill.com/downloadpdf/book/edcoll/9789004299818/B9789004299818_012.pdf

  31. Sophocles - Wikipedia, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sophocles

  32. en.wikipedia.org, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philoctetes_(Sophocles_play)#:~:text=Philoctetes%20(Ancient%20Greek%3A%20%CE%A6%CE%B9%CE%BB%CE%BF%CE%BA%CF%84%CE%AE%CF%84%CE%B7%CF%82%2C,written%20during%20the%20Peloponnesian%20War.

  33. Philoctetes Summary and Study Guide | SuperSummary, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.supersummary.com/philoctetes/summary/

  34. Philoctetes Themes - LitCharts, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.litcharts.com/lit/philoctetes/themes

  35. Oedipus at Colonus: Analysis of Major Characters | EBSCO Research Starters, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://www.ebsco.com/research-starters/literature-and-writing/oedipus-colonus-analysis-major-characters 36. Sophocles: Oedipus at Colonus. Duckworth Companions to Greek and Roman Tragedy, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2011/2011.01.0337. The Plague of Thebes, a Historical Epidemic in Sophocles' Oedipus Rex - PMC, accessed on August 5, 2025, https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3310127/